notnotaginger
notnotaginger t1_j2no6am wrote
Reply to comment by Douchebazooka in The nun and the monk who fell in love and married by Stanny491
Where’s the flaw? Do you have an assertion that there is no contradictions? Because I went to Bible school and in my education even the professors pointed out contradictions and how they dealt with them
notnotaginger t1_j2nnbr9 wrote
Reply to comment by Douchebazooka in The nun and the monk who fell in love and married by Stanny491
Is pointing out flaws hostile? Yikes. If your boss points out an error in your work, is that hostile? Or is it important to analyze our own flaws?
Your definition is super snowflakey.
notnotaginger t1_j2nmke1 wrote
Reply to comment by Douchebazooka in The nun and the monk who fell in love and married by Stanny491
And how did their comment fit that, is the question? Or is it just your interpretation?
notnotaginger t1_j2nkev3 wrote
Reply to comment by Douchebazooka in The nun and the monk who fell in love and married by Stanny491
Can you explain how it is hostile, then?
notnotaginger t1_j2ne78l wrote
Reply to comment by Douchebazooka in The nun and the monk who fell in love and married by Stanny491
They asked a question you dodged: hostile or realistic?
notnotaginger t1_j2nox26 wrote
Reply to comment by Douchebazooka in The nun and the monk who fell in love and married by Stanny491
Sounds like your hostile towards Bible school, by your own definition. Where I am it’s a four year university, and I came out with a BA.
For someone who wants others to follow logical rules of discourse, you’re dismissing mine based on your own prejudices.
If you truly care about logical discourse, you can ALWAYS explain your argument.
And obfuscating when I ask about contradictions says a lot.
You have much higher standards for other then yourself.