Distributed training will get better

I think its apparent in the design the the brain is using math to do a lot

To be fair, how much valid criticism of feminism gets mixed in with foaming at the mouth misogyny on the internet. I can’t remember the last time I read a valid critique of feminism, and toxic femininity that didn’t end up next to way past the line of decency red-pill takes. The internet is a confusing mess.

Of the millions of users some have read the TOS, and there are reasonable expectations, even if someone hasn’t read it. Not reading the contract doesn’t make it invalid, and a government enforcing a corp’s TOS on behalf of its users is actually a step in a positive direction.

Incentives yo

Probably not

They are though

I won this debate with myself in my teens

Its not nihilism to explore a new frontier, its nihilism to not have one.

It definitely works I’m doing this myself

I both agree and disagree, but im too inebriated to flesh my position. I think raise really good point but stop short of the effect the people building the dataset have on the outcome of the results.

We can see our bias, we often don’t admit to it. We can also build highly objective datasets, nothing is perfect bias is a scale. My argument is effectively that the bias we code into system as living participants is much worse than bias coded into an ai that was built from altruistic intention. Every day a human making a decision can exercise a wildly differing gradients of bias, an ai will be consistent.

Mmmm this is debatable it can be done in an unbiased way. The programmers would have to be deliberately biased depending on whether the dataset is indirectly influenced or objectively raw.

Going to need some of that wire in my own brain

I swear to god im like an Ai apocalypse Televangelist. I tell people what is possible already and how quickly this shit is moving forward. I tell people to think about it and start getting ready for the future. Largely ignored, minor interest at best.

On some level I think people know something is coming, Its just not real for most people yet. If AI is images of sci robots to you then yea you can imagine it but meh, but when you crack into the code and hardware I feel like you realize a few holes in knowledge, and general ML competency is all that is standing between humans and a phase change in human society.

We can do it, hybrid is just difficult to fine tune, and fully automated would be expensive while having lots of public resistance.

No one has enough access to enough roadway to really iron out the bugs, and simple devices that give the ais better information to make decisions would have to become standard accessories on vehicles and miles of highway.

I think this stuff is going get rolled in a new wave a tech products, we’re mapping the brain this century, hooking devices into the human nervous system on a level we’ve never seen before. Thoughts to control robots, even fleets of robots. Sure there will be tons of use cases for AI.

Don’t plan your life around a utopian social net that may never show up. If you believe that AGI can transition us to that kind of world, become one of the people who help make it happen.

Nothing is black and white, the varying gradients of empathy and psychopathy allow humans to operate effectively in large numbers. Being out of balance in either direction probably makes for poor decisions.

Unfalsifiable just means we don’t have the capacity to verify, not that it can’t be the case because we can’t verify it.

And to be honest building everything with Goal of solving for AGI is going to be the slow route. Machine learning without AGI is just so goddamn powerful already.

Sounds like embezzlement and government corruption.

I keep saying this too

Think about the complexity of gpt3 and the text to image generators, with a database of known compounds and effects we could predict we would have this about a year ago if not sooner. We were printing unknown compounds before that.

Which will make it easy for people to write off the truth. We will be driven further into echo chambers that confirm what we want to believe rather than trying to validate our beliefs.

We don’t even have a definitive answer for how we do it.