orrk256

orrk256 t1_jdeqjtj wrote

And yet you have people dead because they froze to death, children who would go hungry if not for free school lunches, a poverty rate of over 30%, people living in cars while working. The world's largest prison population.

And to clear up some misunderstandings you seem to have, America generally ends up somewhere in the middle of global education standards, American Hospitals have worse outcomes compared to almost every other first world country, be it child death, or op/post-op complication, let alone the massive amount of people who can't afford basic medical attention.

It's nice to see you list off the great achievements of the wealthy, but that doesn't affect you, now does it?

6

orrk256 t1_jdefpc1 wrote

to put it as people did 100 years ago, if you own the means of production, aka the capital, you profit from the work of those who don't have capital, and the best part is when the people who have capital because they inherit it, they just accumulate more of it.

Damn, someone should write a book on this and help found some scientific movement to study this, we could call it "Capital" and make the study of the market economics!

1

orrk256 t1_jdeeho9 wrote

let me guess, you follow the Chicago school or it's derivations, because even the Kaynsians are adopting more and more "communist" ideas, because shocker, we have 50+ years to see this shit don't work as the neoliberal economists have said it would.

2

orrk256 t1_iyw0x7e wrote

And once it is a competition for the material the profit goes down and the excess companies leave the market, and it gets dominated by the most efficient, leaving the most efficient companies to once again try and offer the lowest cost product that now has a much higher bar for entry into said market because of the inherent advantage created by being able to make it cheaper...

At least finish your theoretical model

1