paquer

paquer t1_j6mvr1t wrote

We can ignore them, and we can also express disdain for them. It’s the internet. People got opinions. Just because an opinion of a show is negative doesn’t mean it cannot be expressed, especially when the discussion is about the show getting cancelled, where those opinions are hella relevant.

I watched S1 Tuca n Berry. Sorry, doesn’t matter how many people worked on it, for me it was literal trash.

I agree it only existed due to BoJack Horseman, which also was pretty bad overall.

−7

paquer t1_j68een5 wrote

Reply to comment by Adghar in ELI5: How does ChatGPT work? by Zurbinjo

You forgot to add in the censorship , and ideological parameters.

Does it just have a database of things it has to conform to / things it’s supposed to ignore?

ie most historical texts and all biology textbooks up to year x would tell you that men cannot get pregnant or menstruate. But in 2023, wouldn’t chatgpt tell you a man can menstruate and get pregnant?

And how does it deal with input data known to be false / lies?

Would it tell you George santos is a Jew”ish” black Hispanic male who’s family avoided the holocaust via being born as white Christians in South America?

4

paquer t1_itnxt5r wrote

Modern radio country is just 80’s rock with twang and it’s all written by AI as far as I can tell.

From what I’ve listened to as of late only like 1 out of every 10 songs isn’t just machine produced country buzzword garbage.

It definitely isn’t the older folk /western country you’re thinking of.

Hopefully some unique and good country artists do develop something new and listenable.

Anyone?

1