phatcan

phatcan OP t1_j0mb3p9 wrote

I think the concept of AI as a tool is cool, as long as it is recognized as AI I think people make the assumption that it's a product of multiple different pieces by multiple different artists so I don't necessarily see AI as dishonest or stealing to those who understand how it works. I will always credit the parts of my work that aren't 100% original, although I admittedly don't know the origin of this pattern. Possibly an unknown Babushka who has long passed away. I think using other peoples art to create more art is subjective, if somebody mashes several pieces of art together, is it their piece? It's their compilation/composition but the credit leans 99% on the original creators. If an artist made a more unique composition that includes another artist's work in a minor way, as long as credit is given where necessary I can appreciate all creators' contributions and the piece as a whole. To me there are grey areas, but I advocate always to allot credit where and when it is due. This is my individual view and I expect that other people may see it differently, and that's okay. As long as nobody is benefiting by taking somebody else's credit then no harm no foul I think.

1

phatcan OP t1_j0ignzo wrote

Reply to comment by Skripp0 in Untitled, Me, Digital, 2022 by phatcan

This, as well as the rest in my series are originally created, rendered and textured in either Cinema4D or Adobe Dimension. Happy to provide screenshots as proof in a DM if you like.

12

phatcan OP t1_j0ica5z wrote

There seems to be some suspicion that this piece is AI, I've tried to respond to these comments with a screenshot as proof, however the sub has removed them due to the rule of no external links. If anybody would like proof in a DM, including a link to other pieces I did in this series, I would be happy to provide them.

Each piece was textured and rendered using either Cinema4D or Adobe Dimension and were done as a nod to my mom who has a massive collection of blue and white china.

88