phraisely
phraisely OP t1_itbuaf0 wrote
Reply to comment by marr75 in [P] Look up words by their description by phraisely
Thank you. Appreciated.
To be honset, at the moment I want to play around, have fun and try to build something that could be useful, even for a little niche of users. Commercial viability comes next, I think.
I've added 'paid plans' because, well, you get support if you ask for it :)
You are probably right; the user might need to play around a little before being confident about using it. So, the number of free queries can help with that.
I'll work on it.
phraisely OP t1_itbmo8g wrote
Reply to comment by marr75 in [P] Look up words by their description by phraisely
Thanks for that. I'll work on adding a query count - at the moment the count is shown in the 'Account' section.
I agree. A more explicit count can be helpful.
phraisely OP t1_itblmc8 wrote
Reply to comment by richi3f in [P] Look up words by their description by phraisely
Thank you! Appreciated.
Let me know if you have any comments or suggestions :)
phraisely OP t1_itbkyxo wrote
Reply to comment by ReginaldIII in [P] Look up words by their description by phraisely
Thank you for your comment.
Email registration is to encourage responsible use and limit any misuse of the tool (or attacks). I'll work on it and see whether I can improve the free trial / registration.
Pricing depends on many factors. Probably this is not the place to discuss that. Also, they can become outdated quickly and be misleading. But this is my opinion and might be wrong :)
phraisely OP t1_itbjl63 wrote
Reply to comment by marr75 in [P] Look up words by their description by phraisely
More free queries could be helpful, I guess.The tool is free and comes with no ads (my preference at the moment). However, users hitting the server comes with a cost on the large scale of things.
I'll work on it (increasing the number of free queries, not the ads) and see what I can do :)
phraisely OP t1_itbhkwr wrote
Reply to comment by darkshenron in [P] Look up words by their description by phraisely
Thank you for your comment. In my opinion, the use cases are a bit different.
Fill-mask capabilities are not the same as looking up words by their description. [Although you might adapt it to fill the placeholder straight away. But that is a different tool]
Also, I think what you are saying about 'it does not need email' is *not* entirely correct. HuggingFace requires you to log in once you reach the rate limit (and do not want to wait to run further queries)
phraisely OP t1_itbg76k wrote
Reply to comment by SolverTom in [P] Look up words by their description by phraisely
Thank you! I thought about running a game in line of your suggestions on twitter to check the appetite for this type of games. I'll give a think to it :)
phraisely OP t1_it8umly wrote
Reply to comment by manimino in [P] Look up words by their description by phraisely
Thank you for the comment. I agree! It is something I can work on.
However, you could potentially ask the model that you are looking for a noun or adjective etc. For example: "an adjective for being home at night watiching netflix on the couch"
Thank you! Appreciated!
phraisely OP t1_it8nnmx wrote
Reply to comment by RafaeldeCampos in [P] Look up words by their description by phraisely
I think onelook is doing a great job.
However, I wanted a tool that could (i) understand the full context in the query and (ii) be accurate when looking up words using *long* and *detailed* descriptions. I couldn't make onelook work well for that use case (also noted in their FAQ).
phraisely OP t1_it8h3g9 wrote
Reply to comment by bluboxsw in [P] Look up words by their description by phraisely
Agreed. I've added an example in the post. To be clear, *only* the email address is required. *No* other information is required.
I've posted to have feedback from users. So, I would be grateful for that.
phraisely OP t1_it8finz wrote
Reply to comment by ChuckSeven in [P] Look up words by their description by phraisely
In the back-end, there is a large language model trained on books and internet data. The aim is to have a model that knows words from literature as well as idioms/slang.
phraisely OP t1_it83kw5 wrote
Reply to [P] Look up words by their description by phraisely
This might also be relevant for r/whatstheword
Submitted by phraisely t3_y9x4ac in MachineLearning
phraisely OP t1_itfqx88 wrote
Reply to comment by RafaeldeCampos in [P] Look up words by their description by phraisely
Thank you. Please let me know of you have any comments or suggestions once you have the chance to pay to play with it.