You live in a simulation and your sidewalk is loading.

FEA is actually part of the generation process... It's basically iterating different designs and validating many times. So the output of the process is already at least FEA validated. You would then do all the additional validation that you would typically do on a classically designed part as well.

2 quid in year 2500 is cheap for a pint.

Just drill right down the pins.

I mean, that's why it can see something that Hubble can't? It's not wrong.

So pointing out that the title is incorrect is something that shouldn't be done or a quirky reddit standard?

Next time really be traditional and use guanciale.

Yeah, I don't think Xbox is a relevant example.

Credit cards in Europe are typically like charge cards in the US. You will have to pay the monthly balance off.

So I can wear the same clothes multiple days in a row without anyone noticing!

r/unexpected

This graph provides plenty of visually derived insight, but not the specific one you chose.

I don't agree with this at all. If you are going to make such a comparison, you should be reading the numbers of the axes, making your point moot.

If anything, OP's title is misleading. This chart just says that tickets on the concord should cost 6x more than a normal flight. Some people could be willing to pay that much due to the faster travel time or whatever. So it really doesn't bring us to the conclusion OP mentions in the title.