rastilin

rastilin t1_ja43a4e wrote

You can't pause updates infinitely. The updates will restart and then force an install.

Microsoft has never had an opportunity to force people to upgrade, DOS didn't get updates. Up until Windows XP updates were something that for most people didn't happen outside of a service pack. Windows 7 had a surprise upgrade shoved out for it. Windows 10 is the first version of Windows that doesn't let you not upgrade. Someone in Microsoft will get the idea that they can just make people upgrade.

−1

rastilin t1_j7gsflo wrote

I called something like this happening years ago. It was obvious that mandatory automatic updates on the operating system had only one endpoint. This will probably end with Microsoft declaring that the only secure OS is one that has a subscription to their Microsoft security suite and they can't in good conscience let your computer boot without one.

8

rastilin t1_itnj19o wrote

DDR5 is 50GB/s, which is workable. But it's possible there'll be a way to apply this technology to get even better throughput on memory and processors as well.

EDIT: Here's a thought. Mosix, the software that allowed pooling processors from multiple separate computers together over a network always had the issue that the network was too slow to properly copy memory around fast enough. With this kind of transfer speed it's actually practical to stream memory from one machine for processing on another.

6