My friend, I am merely pointing out that calling wounded knee a “mass shooting” leads to every battle ever on us soil being a mass shooting. Therefor either wounded knee isn’t a mass shooting or if it is it isn’t the most deadly. Pearl Harbor is just a good comparison for wounded knee because it wasn’t a battle planned for by both sides and the countries weren’t at war yet.

You have besmirched me and I demand satisfaction

Lol at telling me to go somewhere else, your username is “askingandquestioning” obviously a misnomer.

Wounded knee being a mass shooting is just as pedantic as Pearl Harbor or Antietam. When people say mass shooting they are almost always referring to these lone wolf revenge fantasy fucks, not planned military actions whether they be war crimes or not.

The more that I think about it the more I think that Pearl Harbor and wounded knee are very similar. A surprise attack by a military of a nation just showed up and attacked another nation.

Wasn’t a war yet, if 15 Japanese citizen came to America got ar-15s and starting shooting people in Times Square is that a battle in a war?

I mean there were a lot of people shooting, the boats got bombed and strafed. I don’t see how it doesn’t fit the definition.

Pearl Harbor?

I wonder why