redeggplant01

redeggplant01 t1_j88bimx wrote

Reply to comment by Worried_Student_7976 in It's increasingly economical to install large solar facilities in states that don't get as much sun, like NH; DoE says it's competitive with "the cost of burning fuel in existing gas-fired generators." Use the $ you'd spend on a nat-gas plant's fuel to install a solar farm instead! by TurretLauncher

Your inability to disproves what is sourced shows my statement to be spot on .. thanks

0

redeggplant01 t1_j86cakx wrote

Reply to comment by Worried_Student_7976 in It's increasingly economical to install large solar facilities in states that don't get as much sun, like NH; DoE says it's competitive with "the cost of burning fuel in existing gas-fired generators." Use the $ you'd spend on a nat-gas plant's fuel to install a solar farm instead! by TurretLauncher

No such thing as externalities- https://mises.org/library/externalities-argument

0

redeggplant01 t1_j847oe9 wrote

Reply to comment by magellanNH in It's increasingly economical to install large solar facilities in states that don't get as much sun, like NH; DoE says it's competitive with "the cost of burning fuel in existing gas-fired generators." Use the $ you'd spend on a nat-gas plant's fuel to install a solar farm instead! by TurretLauncher

> wind and solar are the lowest cost sources of power generation we have right now.

no they are not .. not without stealing from the taxpayer to subsidize them

1

redeggplant01 t1_j847npu wrote

Reply to comment by magellanNH in It's increasingly economical to install large solar facilities in states that don't get as much sun, like NH; DoE says it's competitive with "the cost of burning fuel in existing gas-fired generators." Use the $ you'd spend on a nat-gas plant's fuel to install a solar farm instead! by TurretLauncher

> wind and solar are the lowest cost sources of power generation we have right now.

no they are not .. not without stealing from the taxpayer to subsidize them

3

redeggplant01 t1_j83tson wrote

Reply to It's increasingly economical to install large solar facilities in states that don't get as much sun, like NH; DoE says it's competitive with "the cost of burning fuel in existing gas-fired generators." Use the $ you'd spend on a nat-gas plant's fuel to install a solar farm instead! by TurretLauncher

Its only economical because the government is subsidizing such programs which are funded by taxes ( theft )

That is by defintion a bubble

−1

redeggplant01 OP t1_j7354y0 wrote

Reply to comment by ProlapsedMasshole in An Expensive Lesson that NH could learn from Veront by redeggplant01

Then you missed

"The “LEAP” model used by the consultants (Energy Futures Group of Hinesburg), which was developed by the Stockholm Environment Institute and funded by the Swedish government, plus numerous environmental groups and renewable energy proponents, is available to the public. But the actual data assumptions used by the consultants and the results produced by the LEAP model are not.

The Ethan Allen Institute’s recent open records request to the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources turned up nothing. According to the agency, the data used for all of the modeling and the detailed results were not part of the “deliverables” from the consultants who wrote the action plan. Thus no independent review of the costs and supposed benefits is possible. "

−3

redeggplant01 OP t1_j72viy9 wrote

Reply to comment by ProlapsedMasshole in An Expensive Lesson that NH could learn from Veront by redeggplant01

Then you missed

"The “LEAP” model used by the consultants (Energy Futures Group of Hinesburg), which was developed by the Stockholm Environment Institute and funded by the Swedish government, plus numerous environmental groups and renewable energy proponents, is available to the public. But the actual data assumptions used by the consultants and the results produced by the LEAP model are not.

The Ethan Allen Institute’s recent open records request to the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources turned up nothing. According to the agency, the data used for all of the modeling and the detailed results were not part of the “deliverables” from the consultants who wrote the action plan. Thus no independent review of the costs and supposed benefits is possible. "

−2

redeggplant01 t1_j72uj0x wrote

Reply to comment by BelichicksBurner in https://www.sentinelsource.com/news/local/statehouse/nh-bill-would-reverse-plans-to-end-dividend-and-interest-tax/article_b6c3a960-b863-5960-b0dd-0fcb8104b568.html by BelichicksBurner

The US had schools, Paved Roads, Army, Navy, Colleges, and other services that existed before the Income Tax [ 1913 ] AND Corporate Tax [1909 ]

Taxes [ theft ] only exist to fund policies to push a nation into socialism [ serfdom ]

https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Taxed.jpg?x91208

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sgNDgqXzA0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8nTVj61Yv8

−1

redeggplant01 t1_j72rxcz wrote

Reply to comment by BelichicksBurner in https://www.sentinelsource.com/news/local/statehouse/nh-bill-would-reverse-plans-to-end-dividend-and-interest-tax/article_b6c3a960-b863-5960-b0dd-0fcb8104b568.html by BelichicksBurner

> TRICKLE DOWN ECONOMICS DOESN'T WORK.

Yes it does

Wealth is property and the amount accumulated by one person is not the business of any other person and it is only in jail that wealth fairly distributed

Nor is wealth hoarded. it does one or more of 3 things

The rich will place their wealth in the banks which is then loaned out by the banks which in turn creates new jobs

The wealthy will invest their wealth in some other industry through stocks/equities which again will create new jobs

The wealthy will spend their wealth on their own consumption which in turn also creates new jobs

That's is the trickle down theory and it works fine

THE PROBLEM THE LEFT WHINES ABOUT BUT DOES NOT UNDERSTAND, is that government has inserted itself because it thinks it knows better then the market where wealth should flow.

Through policies of theft ( taxation ), prohibition, state granted monopolies, subsdies, and regulations, it has stifled the flow of wealth and thus the poor suffer for it

−5