renopriestgod

renopriestgod t1_j83lj7p wrote

Honestly? What do you think this contribute to?

  1. Freedom does not exist
  2. You talk about freedom as a feeling. And sure it can have value to talk about illusions
  3. Also to talk about freedom as difference of associate or dissociate with something, is just to high jack the term freedman for something else. It implies freedom is always the feel you do what is true to yourself. Which is easily proven not to be the case.

This entire article rest on Redefinition of words and unstable premises. Do better

−1

renopriestgod t1_j72pevs wrote

You choose the have any cognitive configuration, but Solypsism does not conform to the external world(which is logic since it denounce a external world. How the mind can exist without external worlds is a question. It is beliving that one is a go’s that creates everything yet don’t remember any of it). Also the philosophical stance don’t further any understanding about the worlds and is therefore useless by definition

1