robot_pancake
robot_pancake t1_itz6scv wrote
Reply to comment by GreenTunicKirk in BlackRock HQ in NYC stormed with pitchforks. by helloworld_141
On the other spectrum, you’ve got Bloomberg, which is famous for its floors—yeah, floors—of fresh fruit, snacks, and coffee that are available for anyone inside. That BlackRock suit sounds like an ass.
robot_pancake t1_itz63yy wrote
Reply to comment by Jack_Sandwich in BlackRock HQ in NYC stormed with pitchforks. by helloworld_141
“Stormed” is definitely the wrong word here.
The protest makes for good marketing material though. You hand out a pamphlet with this picture and contextualize it with information about their stance—and it becomes far more powerful. This is only one part of their greater communication strategy.
No minds in that building were changed, but that wasn’t the point.
robot_pancake t1_itz5gr4 wrote
Reply to comment by Jack_Sandwich in BlackRock HQ in NYC stormed with pitchforks. by helloworld_141
Genuinely curious why you think this is or where I can read more about this perspective. :)
robot_pancake t1_itz8afz wrote
Reply to comment by barrystrawbridgess in BlackRock HQ in NYC stormed with pitchforks. by helloworld_141
Thanks for the links!
How is it blackmail if companies and governments aren’t forced to purchase these funds? One of Tariq’s main points (first vid) is that purchasing an ESG fund doesn’t stop other institutions and larger market players from buying non-ESG funds, which softens divestment initiatives. Tariq also argues that investment is only part of the solution—carbon taxes, caps—whatever we call it—require governments and markets to be in lockstep to make meaningful change.