rosecavan
rosecavan t1_iy2ygks wrote
Reply to comment by MarzannaMorena in I strongly dislike “smutty” books by [deleted]
100%, that’s what I consider the “wrong aspects” to focus on. It’s way hotter (and less cringe) to read about how a character is reacting to an act, where their gazes linger and things like that, than descriptions of how things look.
rosecavan t1_iy2r3cz wrote
Reply to I strongly dislike “smutty” books by [deleted]
I haven’t read many published books with smut but so far, I agree. I think lots of authors just don’t have practice with it and yeah, focus on the wrong aspects of the scene or try to force some flower-y prose that just kills it.
Will say though, if you have some fictional couples you already love a lot then try reading fan fiction of them! Again this is hit and miss but there are so many amazing fics out there and fic authors who’ve mastered fitting character development into smut scenes. + since there’s so many one-shots/short fics out there, you could easily read a bunch and figure out if it’s all smut or just some that turns you off.
rosecavan t1_itp5x73 wrote
Reply to comment by Beiez in Dorian Gray by JackMcBryde
This is still my favorite book but man do i agree 100%
rosecavan t1_iy2yt2l wrote
Reply to comment by scarletseasmoke in I strongly dislike “smutty” books by [deleted]
XD yeah I definitely don’t mean all fic authors have mastered it, just that lots have. Fanfic still gets a bad rep sometimes and its just not accurate