runswithcoyotes
runswithcoyotes t1_j6mqqlk wrote
Reply to comment by Hypx in DARPA wants aircraft that can maneuver with a radically different method by Hypx
I wonder if when Mr Dyson submits his new plane into the contest, will it be yellow or fuchsia?
runswithcoyotes t1_iyztq40 wrote
Reply to comment by vtssge1968 in Google says they have made a significant advance in allowing humans to communicate with robots using natural language, and claim an "order of magnitude" increase in capabilities over previous approaches. by lughnasadh
>Thank you for calling Product Support. I see you are a new caller. First, let’s administer a basic IQ test to help get to the root of the problem.
runswithcoyotes t1_iw17s1j wrote
Reply to comment by lughnasadh in The CEO of OpenAI had dropped hints that GPT-4, due in a few months, is such an upgrade from GPT-3 that it may seem to have passed The Turing Test by lughnasadh
We need a new Turing test. Now an AI will determine if it’s talking to a human.
runswithcoyotes t1_ivyz8bs wrote
Reply to Chinese scientist develop new method of rare earth mining that is more effective and uses much less toxic chemicals by mutherhrg
Fewer, Nature. Fewer.
runswithcoyotes t1_iv6d9r7 wrote
Reply to comment by ageispolispura in Researchers designed a transparent window coating that could lower the temperature inside buildings, without expending a single watt of energy. This cooler may lead to an annual energy saving of up to 86.3 MJ/m² or 24 kWh/m² in hot climates by mossadnik
> Wouldn't it make outdoor temps higher?
That’s how A/Cs work today.. except they consume electricity and produce additional mechanical heat.
Think of this as a way to passively create a cooler bubble within a hot climate by creating two areas of distinct average temperature. It’s not really adding anything to that climate, and the overall average is still the same.
runswithcoyotes t1_it4yed7 wrote
Reply to comment by LaPommeDeTerre in Experimental demonstration of entanglement delivery using a quantum network stack by matpompili
Ah, thanks! So I this explains why you can’t send specific values:
If you force one side to change, it breaks the entanglement. UNLESS you modify the state in a way that you can compare the changes that led to the state later. I don’t really understand why that is, and will need to dig into the nested links to find out.
> Alice and Bob end up with measurements that are perfectly correlated, no information passes between them. They can only see the correlation when they get back together and compare lists, and they have to do that at or below the speed of light.
But! My question wasn’t actually about specific states, it was about changes in states. Which.. to me still seems possible.
runswithcoyotes t1_isrt18g wrote
Reply to comment by matpompili in Experimental demonstration of entanglement delivery using a quantum network stack by matpompili
Why not? Any change is itself a message.
Edit: to whoever downvoted me, you obviously don’t understand signaling. Any change in states, is at the very least a binary message. Couple that with timing, and multiple bits, and you’ve got yourself a full-fledged messaging platform. Egg heads like OP here aren’t able to explain why this wont work. I’m happy to listen to an explanation, if one could just be provided.
runswithcoyotes t1_isao9ic wrote
Reply to AI Can Offer Insight Into Who Responds to Antidepressants. A new algorithm predicts response to Sertraline with 83 percent accuracy. by Sariel007
I don’t understand this article. How effective is this particular medication in the general population? We are missing key information.
> along with predicting response to Sertraline with 83.7 percent accuracy could similarly detect response to the placebo with 83 percent accuracy
runswithcoyotes t1_ja613ap wrote
Reply to comment by Gari_305 in Wormholes Bend Light Like Black Holes Do — and That Makes it Possible to Find Them, New Study by Gari_305
> they could magnify the light of distant objects by up to 100,000
Well. The new galaxy finds from JWST have an explanation then.