Yeah yeah I get it, if you stretch your imagination enough you can't ever be wrong.

But gosh maybe this post about a Confucian/Taoist practice does not really say anything at all about Greek practices.

You're supporting my position, you just don't understand what you're saying.

>but even completely fictional characters are based

Come the hell on.

>It's pretty safe to assume that gods didn't actually exist back then but these stories must have had some origin

Right that makes sense, wonder who the real Batman is, think he lives in New York with Superman?

What do you mean "not unlikely"? What would you base that likelihood on?

In American Gods? Yes. In reality? Also yes.

Those guys were born half gods and stayed half god though.

Ya do believe the moon was split in two though and put back together, and depending on what is convenient it was either fused perfectly, or some valley on the moon is proof it happened.

2 innit?

Well smoking weed puts everyone around you at risk of injury or death, while driving drunk is completely harmless.

Could you imagine if the harmless crime got a stricter punishment? That'd be crazy.

Well nothing in the bible forbidding slavery.

Which is odd really, don't steal made the cut, no worshipping false idols made the cut, not owning other people though, no rules against that.

What colonial thing.

Oh, one of them has enough talent to get a pass on terrible behavior is the point.

That's not better, are you gonna clarify into something even worse now?

>Two wrongs don't make a right, but

But you'd like them to? Because Chris Browns awful fan base stood by him you'd love to emulate that?

Bigger threat to stability than forcefully seizing a countries assets and land and people?

Have a pat on the head and be on your way, I'm done.

Pretending you were trolling all along to cover for your obvious misunderstanding.

Glass is less transparent.

>There seems to be confusion.

Confusion seems to be entirely on your end.

For one, you just replied to yourself, not me.

Two, the conversation was not about the definition of loopholes, pretty clear to everyone else, how embarrassing for you.

OK I'll be more clear, what is it you think you're contributing here?

?

Sure there were reasons and background for why it played out that way.

Just saying "clever" does not really enter into it.

Does it? Like how is the loophole "clever"? Just seems like one of their arbitrary rules became inconvenient, so they arbitrarily changed it.

As I recall werewolves range from vastly more powerful than a young vampire, to barely a threat for older ones.

And the end result of them becoming too comfortable around humans is them being put down, which makes a few paintballs seem a lot more merciful.

And for all we know it could be a positive legend. Like it sounds super silly to us, but maybe people who would sacrifice animals for a good harvest would find this story completely reasonable.