Most likely research pace will be limited by rather long human lifespan and number of "test subjects". Also ethical issues and law will stand in way

Death in nature originally served as a way to remove individuals from a population who are not able to successfully reproduce or contribute to the survival of their species. It would be nice if humans jumped over this evolutionary legacy, and offloaded evolution to organization level, instead of human level. Some would say it would be a way to accumulate wealth for these who use such therapies, buy we have the same issue with people inheriting and multiplying wealth of their parents. No death would change a little in the matter of wealth accumulation: no death = no inheritance. Overpopulation at worst can be controlled by law, but honestly when time comes we figure out how to not die, we'll hopefully also be in need of populating other planets. e.g. we could incentivize inter-planetary migrations to colonies on Europa (Moon of Jupiter) or Mars. Actually Earth-bored 200-old hyper-rich will be probably willing to go just for fun, while young low class will go for money, adventure, quick colonization. With possibility to go back of course ;) Also from what I know prolonging life is the best we can count on, as death is due to accumulation of "mistakes" our bodies make, so fixing them all will take like 1000 years even for AI. In conclusion I would not count on living forever, but I can easily imagine currently living humans to live extremely long, like 300 years.

:( i hope it will

yes! I want buy next one

My point is even AI knows there are like 2-3 major search engines and that's it. And I am curious about other choices, because it doesn't seem right. And I am curious about Reddit opinion, not AI opinion.

Yes exactly. I have guts to admit I have no idea what you mean, but most people just will argue

From my experience the less verbose you are, the more (wrong) assumptions people make, also they point out exceptions to disproof your statement even if it is correct in most of the cases. So it's not bad by itself it is verbose, but that it is verbose when it doesn't really need to. And don't even get me started what people do if you try to explain something by non-perfect analogy.

upgrade(:sense_of_humor)

Do random stuff to please The Great Gradient Descent

By the way, this sub is going to shit recently

We already have surplus of food and vertical farms are very inefficient. The problem is distribution and good will, not production

For near future AI will continue to be a tool. It's like your children owning metal foundry while you are still blacksmithing

The march of replacing Propertiary Software and Hardware with Open Source and Open Hardware will last forever. In parallel with centralization / decentralization cycle. It's not governed by anyone, it's social dynamic

They will require operators for security purposes. The smarter they are and more powerful they are the more need for someone watching their actions. I can't imagine other course of action. I guess in the future most of humans will work as operators / watchers of GAI

So by telling it what AI might potentially do if gone bad, it will actually do it because that's pretty much what it knows about advanced AI

Plus situation of mentally ill from rich and poor families is drastically different

That's why job market will always exist, so one can have better entertainment in life if he/she contributes anything to society. There should be no requirement to work to meet basic needs though, including basic entertainment, like $5000/month basic income or something, depending on country. I think there must be some nice mix between socialism and capitalism that will work for everyone, but currently no work = no food and no home, which is obviously bad

People forget universal income is not end of world order, just making sure everyone can have stress-free life when it comes to meeting basic needs like food or hosing. If we can get past this stress, people can be more relaxed, happy, and productive. Instead of waling around with crippling anxiety and depression.

Namely gptchat is connecting to everything

I think artists should have at least the right to use image-generating AI models for free, as work they produced was used to train these models. The same way GitHub already provides free AI code assistant for developers on whose code this assistant was trained on.

We're heading towards wage slave by humans *using* artificial lifeforms, not good. Actually it kinda already happened.

I think we need to try different things at the same time, and being skeptical is one of things we should do. AI and technology advance is rolling boulder we can't stop, but we can collaboratively nudge it in right direction. Or multiple directions until one proves better than other.

Yes. Good? Bad? We could add some extra twist compared to human capitalism like Karma points instead of money.

Alternating between jokingly suicidal and cautiously optimistic is great attitude when talking about topics we can influence a little. Like looming WWIII or end of things as we know them in case of technological singularity / plurality. I think everyone is scared a little bit of things to come, we just channel it into positive speculation, actionable defense ideas and jokes.