sheerun

sheerun t1_ix379mf wrote

I think by half of year we'll have pretty good text-to-3d, text-to-audio, maybe text-to-video, and by the end of year good integration of these models which means baby GAI. It won't be singularity but more like raising an extremely smart human, by whole humanity. It will make many mistakes and won't be reliable, but will continuously amaze us.

4

sheerun t1_iwigcnv wrote

Maybe smartheads from https://www.lesswrong.com/ and corporate/academia AI/machine learning researchers. Not that worrying is not justified, very very justified. Controlling GAI is not possible directly indefinitely, we need another GAI, so recursive problem, or let them goooooooo, which has its own worries like killing humans as leverage in war with between GAIs, by mistake, or something. We need to set out cooperation rules, but more importantly plan how to enforce them, if even possible. I think pacifying rogue states like Russia or Iran will be (or is) an important part of this plan. We want a future where killing humans is not a preferred way to fight a war or resolve conflicts. Or even better future where wars are the past, and we focus on space expansion.

−1

sheerun t1_iw5ealj wrote

I did Open Source my life, then Github Open Sourced code generator learned (among others) on my code. I never intended my code to be propertiary, but I also understand you need to pay for computing power and support. Ultimately I think open models that anyone can host, like Bloom (https://bigscience.huggingface.co/blog/bloom), are the future, and I hope the same for the art world. Make AI your collaborative Open Source tool, and educate to use it creatively, as only then knowledge can be extracted from it in the future. Willingly refuse to use any Closed Source

2

sheerun t1_ituck5o wrote

Interestingly this buffer may not last half a second, but minutes, days, weeks, months, and years. This is: we perceive and act on world by using all of our past memory. Both are obvious things, but surprise is that they are very tightly connected. Catching a fly is not much different than deciding on very long term actions, decisions that require huge amount of past memory, instead of 1 second of it

4

sheerun t1_ito5n5o wrote

We live in society of multiple facades, brain-computer interface won't change it. It will serve every facade. Top ones to gain power, middle for money and surveillance, then lower layers of society indeed will use it in positive ways. All I'm saying it can unleash as many good things as bad things, and wealthy will get this technology first. Software, especially Open Source is more forgiving than hardware.

−1