skepticaljesus
skepticaljesus t1_j0iunfe wrote
Reply to comment by Alterscapes in I’m Mike Shenk, Crossword Editor for the Wall Street Journal. AMA. by wsj
I personally had a stye a few months ago, and it was also a topic of conversation last weekend with my sister-in-law who currently had one. So, not infrequently, I guess?
skepticaljesus t1_j0isa7y wrote
Reply to comment by Alterscapes in I’m Mike Shenk, Crossword Editor for the Wall Street Journal. AMA. by wsj
in that case it would be interesting to know how he defines "crosswordese", because I've always understood it to mean "words and concepts that are common in crosswords, and more or less nonexistent in real life", which stye demonstrably is not.
skepticaljesus t1_j0hwdd5 wrote
Reply to comment by wsj in I’m Mike Shenk, Crossword Editor for the Wall Street Journal. AMA. by wsj
Is that crosswordese? I've definitely used that in casual conversation, and is a thing that is occasionally genuinely relevant to my life unlike, say, ETUI or mel OTT.
skepticaljesus t1_j0hw7qa wrote
Reply to comment by tehmlem in I’m Mike Shenk, Crossword Editor for the Wall Street Journal. AMA. by wsj
are there people who dont do that?
skepticaljesus t1_j0iw6hy wrote
Reply to comment by Alterscapes in I’m Mike Shenk, Crossword Editor for the Wall Street Journal. AMA. by wsj
I'm not trying to be like "I have this very unique experience, and that should be everyone's experience", I just genuinely didn't think of styes as this ultra esoteric concept that people only understand in the abstract, i think of it as a relatively common, relatable experience that most people will probably have a few times in their life.
Is that not the case?