skybluepink77
skybluepink77 t1_j8ssol7 wrote
Reply to comment by boxer_dogs_dance in 84 Charing Cross Road a Subtle Charming Story about Friendship Between Book Lovers by boxer_dogs_dance
Been recommending this book for years; this is a quiet, subtle gem, and the charm of it, is its sincerity and warmth.
The movie is absolutely true to the book, though it's Anne Bancroft, not Judi Dench - Hopkins is wonderful in it.
skybluepink77 t1_iu5y81k wrote
Reply to comment by dibawlif in Upon some reflection, I didn't actually like the Night Circus all that much. by ThuliumNice
No! Do read it - or at least, try a few chapters. I didn't like it but I don't regret reading it, and lots of people do like it. It's all a matter of taste and preference.
skybluepink77 t1_iu5xwcj wrote
Reply to comment by ThuliumNice in Upon some reflection, I didn't actually like the Night Circus all that much. by ThuliumNice
They wouldn't need to have an attraction - that might complicate it too much - but it would be good if they had some sort of relationship...there didn't seem to be any reason, apart from a mix of ego and boredom, as to why they were 'duelling' anyway.
Morgenstern can't 'do' character, the only character who had a slight bit of personality was Friedrich, and she killed him off!
skybluepink77 t1_iu3jhoj wrote
Reply to Upon some reflection, I didn't actually like the Night Circus all that much. by ThuliumNice
Read it in my bookclub recently, and we all disliked it [I really disliked it, had to force myself to read it.]
I don't like books with circuses, clowns etc in anyway, so I started with a prejudice...
Like wading through a sticky sea of sugary, sickly frosting. Too much description, too elaborate, 1-dimensional boring characters, insta-love, anti-climatic ending, I could go on but you get the idea. A lot of people like it though, so that's fine. Just don't ask me to read it again, I'd rather stick pins in my eyeballs.
skybluepink77 t1_itglnh2 wrote
Reply to comment by Valdrothos in Genre question - Slice of life, but fantasy or sci-fi? by Valdrothos
Of Clarke's two novels to date, one - Jonathan Strange - is sort of placed in the Napoleonic era [ but it is not an 'historical' novel] and Piranesi is contemporary [again, sort of.]
LOTR isn't really slice of life, but it's well-written. And of course, is the classic 'quest' story. So - it's whatever you want to go for!
skybluepink77 t1_itg4266 wrote
As a very rough guide, the more 'literary' the book is [rather than a book that's been designed to sit very happily on the fantasy shelf], the more unusual the book is and more willing it is to avoid the epic cliches/quest etc tropes.
So you could try 'literary fantasy/scifi'?
I know you don't want specific titles, but as I'm the same as you in that I don't want to read the same old cliches over and over, I'd go for an author like Susanna Clarke [eg Piranesi] which goes off on its own path. It's certainly slice of life but a very, very odd life!
skybluepink77 t1_j8tmghn wrote
Reply to comment by boxer_dogs_dance in 84 Charing Cross Road a Subtle Charming Story about Friendship Between Book Lovers by boxer_dogs_dance
Oops. Serves me right for correcting you when I hadn't even recalled Dame Judi was in the movie!