Once the question is settled in court, it will be easier for smaller companies and individuals to defend themselves. Possibly not easy enough, that's true.

Microsoft uses Google search results, but blocks Google from using Bing search results. From this you draw the conclusion it's not anticompetitive?

It's in beta because it's wrong too often, it's not wrong because it's in beta. Not like if they declare it done it will be wrong less often.

It's not finished, and at the current stage it's spreading misinformation. Sure, if they fix it we should use it. But as it is now... Maybe not.

"Ever" is a long time, but I don't think we will solve economics as it is defined today. Maybe if we reframe the problem somehow, and in the process change the way society deals with money and allocation of resources.

Another problem is that if it was "solved", who gets rich or poor would be predetermined and probably could be changed as we want. How could that work? Who would accept a system where the results of a lifetime of work are fixed and you cannot change them? Communism had a big problem with this, nobody bothered to do a good job at work, because it made no difference to your income or status or anything like that.

One of the reasons is you can't do controlled experiments in macroeconomics. Can't start with 3 identical countries and try them with higher, normal and lower interbank rates, while making sure everything else is the same.

Your description sounds like the only effect would be first higher then lower than normal pressure. Read on what happens to divers who go down or up too much too fast. It would be the same I guess.

Let's never invent anything new, 'cause we suck at regulating tech.

Don't try to improve regulations and governments, why would you do such a thing?

Sounds like you are seriously saying we shouldn't have invented telephones and airplanes.

This is what totalitarian regimes do: they sacrifice anything to maintain power. Economy, lives, environment, literally anything.