somethingrandom261

somethingrandom261 t1_izgd3ag wrote

These aren’t necessarily misleading, they’re focused, and they tell a story. For example with the first, unless if you squint at the labels you might not even be able to tell if there was an increase. For the second, yea idk. The third I’d assume that you’d be wanting to look at things after a major break. The most common I’ve seen is, yes, Covid happened and it hurt. We don’t need every chart to show how much worse off we are, we want to see how recovery is progressing. As with everything, you’ve gotta use some critical thinking to see if it’s being being misleading, or if it’s adjusted for clarity.

1

somethingrandom261 t1_itggq8q wrote

Delete everything after “with” except “good faith” and we’d be 99% there. There’s just too much to gain from, and all the mechanisms reward instead of punish, bad faith.

1