spektre
spektre t1_ja2m0hx wrote
Reply to comment by Prestigious_Push_947 in Signal CEO: We “1,000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption by ActivePersona
What they are saying is that they can't protect against someone for example forcing you to unlock it, installing a keylogger, or taking screenshots of your conversations. Because that would be a pretty hard problem to solve.
spektre t1_ja2lfyq wrote
Reply to comment by NoPriorThreat in Signal CEO: We “1,000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption by ActivePersona
Yeah, if the camera automatically unlocks the door.
spektre t1_ja2oz3h wrote
Reply to comment by drever123 in Signal CEO: We “1,000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption by ActivePersona
That doesn't matter at all from a systematical perspective.
It could be your plans to topple the genocidal dictator, it could be your drug trafficking business, it could be your vacation photos you don't want a phone repairman getting access to.
Shaming people for wanting privacy is not cool.