This paper was submitted to and published by Nature Astronomy. Presumably, it was peer-reviewed before being published. If the probability of the FRB being associated with the gravitational wave is not much better than random chance, what does that say about the peer review process at Nature Astronomy? Is it broken?
Successful full-duration static fire. Elon indicates they "turned off 1 engine just before start & 1 stopped itself, so 31 engines fired overall. But still enough engines to reach orbit!"
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1623793909959901184?s=20
spsheridan OP t1_je1i8ca wrote
Reply to comment by Andromeda321 in Fast radio burst linked with gravitational waves for the first time by spsheridan
This paper was submitted to and published by Nature Astronomy. Presumably, it was peer-reviewed before being published. If the probability of the FRB being associated with the gravitational wave is not much better than random chance, what does that say about the peer review process at Nature Astronomy? Is it broken?