st4nkyFatTirebluntz
st4nkyFatTirebluntz t1_ivnxe2o wrote
Reply to comment by ptjunkie in Experimental “FLASH” cancer treatment aces first human trial by tonymmorley
Listen, I'm high, tired, and didn't even slightly read the underlying study. But, wasn't that the whole point? That they tried maximizing the rate of delivery to the affected area, and that it seems to improve the ratio of therapeutic benefit to harmful side effect?
Spitballing wildly, I'd imagine there's some sort of optimal rate for tumor destruction (obviously dependent on the type of tumor and other specific details), and optimal rates for non-tumor preservation, and you'd be able to optimize between the two by utilizing multiple beams from multiple directions in certain scenarios.
st4nkyFatTirebluntz t1_j8m9ajo wrote
Reply to comment by Bensemus in SpaceX rolls naked Starship prototype to test site by RGregoryClark
One a day is the nearish-term engine production target, not the starship one