steved84

steved84 OP t1_iujdfqz wrote

They appear to be leaning on this smoke sensor as it’s proof. I have no reason to lie on this board - I was there celebrating a friend’s 40th birthday - we had 4 people with us - none of us smoke (cigarettes or marijuana) or vape. The group I was with probably wouldn’t be known as the life of any party (my wife laughed when I told her this story, knowing the group I was with). And myself, I’ve probably smoked a cigarette 2 or 3 times in my life - tried it with friends in high school once, and maybe one or two other times at college parties. I am not a fan of smoking. The only thing I can think of is that we were sitting at a Blackjack table shortly prior stopping in the room, and somebody sitting behind the table had a cigar. Maybe the close proximity to that cigar smoke was picked up on some clothes and that kicked off an alert.

Conceptually, I like the idea of closely monitoring for cigarette smoke - I personally hate smoke - this seems like a money grab versus actually trying to enforce a no smoke policy.

I wish this wasn’t frustrating me so much, but I am being dinged by some clearly imprecise technology.

50