sumane12
sumane12 t1_jeb1wh1 wrote
Reply to comment by WonderFactory in GPT characters in games by YearZero
>I'm hoping though that inference costs will come down by the time the game is finished.
Genius. This is exactly what will happen, and I'm glad someone has the forethought to develop the product, before the underlying technology is ready, because it will be there.
sumane12 t1_jea31ax wrote
Reply to The voice in our head is like an AI generator - whatever content youāre feeding it is the reality it creates for you. by noodsaregood
Yea I've had this thought also. I think a multimodal LLM will be the "brain" of every complex AI system we create. The fact that our brains have multiple compartments make me think we may need a bunch of different AIs. Although a lot of that is to do with our biological mech walkers.
sumane12 t1_je7ntc9 wrote
Reply to comment by just_thisGuy in If you can live another 50 years, you will see the end of human aging by thecoffeejesus
Seems like it's going that way for sure, but I guess anything can happen.
sumane12 t1_je6m9d2 wrote
The human brain proves there's a hell of a way to go.
sumane12 t1_je6jgw8 wrote
Reply to comment by civilrunner in If you can live another 50 years, you will see the end of human aging by thecoffeejesus
Remember, you're judging this based on people who are dieing in their 80s today, think about what life was like 60 years ago when they were in their 20s, open coal fires, smoking and passive smoking, little to no understanding of health and fitness (general population), little to no health and safety at work regulations, little to no enforcement of FDA regulations, little to no understanding of the effects of alcohol, obesity etc. Not to mention the effect of caloric restriction, intermittent fasting, Metformin, yamanaka factors, resveratrol, these will have a compounding effect to the point I believe anyone born 1980s+ will probably have an average life span closer to 100 than 80. That's assuming no further medical advancements between now and then.
sumane12 t1_je6ceff wrote
Reply to The Limits of ASI: Can We Achieve Fusion, FDVR, and Consciousness Uploading? by submarine-observer
Breaking speed of light?
sumane12 t1_je5uimv wrote
Not yet.
But yes, eventually.
sumane12 t1_je5r4z9 wrote
Reply to comment by ShadowRazz in If you can live another 50 years, you will see the end of human aging by thecoffeejesus
š love this, might include it in a new dystopian drama
sumane12 t1_je5mx5i wrote
Reply to comment by ImpossibleSnacks in If you can live another 50 years, you will see the end of human aging by thecoffeejesus
Yea, could be wrong I suppose, anything can happen. Just seems a lot is changing right now, and most people don't experience change like we will.
sumane12 t1_je4uid9 wrote
Reply to comment by Xbot391 in If you can live another 50 years, you will see the end of human aging by thecoffeejesus
Either UBI, or what my AI pet will make for me. failing both of those ideas, 99.9% of the rest of the population will be in the same boat, so I'm looking at a world wide violent revolution, where we take the wealth created by AI for ourselves.
Third option is looking less and less likely by the day (most people actually want to look after others, and the democratisation of these technologies is forcing prices down), but I'm ready to fight for the survival of myself and family if necessary. I do believe abundance is not only possible, but exceedingly likely in the near term.
sumane12 t1_je4n03c wrote
Reply to comment by Ginkotree48 in If you can live another 50 years, you will see the end of human aging by thecoffeejesus
"And since your going to live forever, you can pay that off over 100 years at 12 grand per year"
I'd take that deal all the live long day.
sumane12 t1_je489j2 wrote
Even if it is 50, and that's pessimistic I think, you will get life extension therapies before actual longevity escape velocity, so I'm expecting someone like myself 38 years old, to live atleast another 80-100 years.
sumane12 t1_jdxk80f wrote
Reply to The goalposts for "I'll believe it's real AI when..." have moved to "literally duplicate Einstein" by Yuli-Ban
Who cares anymore, let them say what they want, meanwhile gpt4 will actually be solving problems.
sumane12 t1_jds5lwr wrote
Reply to J.A.R.V.I.S like personal assistant is getting closer. Personal voice assistant run locally on M1 pro/ by Neither_Novel_603
That delay kills me, far too long. I'm guessing gpt5 will have to be multimodal with sound so can recognise words and doesn't need to process into text
sumane12 t1_jdqa3ju wrote
Reply to comment by uhdonutmindme in Ai inventionā¦.. coming soon by Ishynethetruth
If it repeated training data nearly verbatim, hallucinations would not be an issue.
sumane12 t1_jdq6k9f wrote
Reply to comment by uhdonutmindme in Ai inventionā¦.. coming soon by Ishynethetruth
If it repeated training data verbatim, hallucinations would not be an issue.
sumane12 t1_jdq0feg wrote
Reply to comment by uhdonutmindme in Ai inventionā¦.. coming soon by Ishynethetruth
This is not how it's working.
sumane12 t1_jdlk01n wrote
Reply to Can we just stop arguing about semantics when it comes to AGI, Theory of Mind, Creativity etc.? by DragonForg
>Because in the end, consequences are what matters not what they are called
This is is all that matters. Call it what you like, it's not going to stop it taking your job
sumane12 t1_jdlj54u wrote
Reply to comment by D_Ethan_Bones in What if the Singularity is the solution to the Fermi Paradox? by discoreapor
This is the answer.
Considering life on this planet went through atleast 5 major extinction events and took 4 billion years to create creatures intelligent enough to leave the planet, it's likely that space faring civilizations are extremely rare. Now let's give a low range estimate that the first intelligent creatures arrived approximately 4 billion years after the big bang, that gives them at the very maximum, a 9 billion light year sphere of radio broadcast. Given that the observable universe is 93b light years accross, that first civilization would have only sent out radio waves in 10% of the universe, which means we could very easily be in a part of space that it hasn't reached yet.
This all falls apart if FTL is achieved, but I suspect if that's the case, then it won't really matter.
sumane12 t1_jcxjvq0 wrote
Reply to The internal language of LLMs: Semantically-compact representations by Lesterpaintstheworld
Hahaha nice someone else has figured it out š
sumane12 t1_j9ptb8u wrote
Reply to comment by Fedude99 in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Great post. I was about to counter that religion would require some kind of worship, but there's religions such Buddhism that requires no such worship.
sumane12 t1_j9jz889 wrote
Reply to comment by soapyshinobi in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Atleast AI can make accurate predictions for the next character in a line of text, which is better than any religion has predicted š¤£
sumane12 t1_j9j3b9j wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
Fucking wow!
sumane12 t1_j9j0pi7 wrote
Reply to What. The. ***k. [less than 1B parameter model outperforms GPT 3.5 in science multiple choice questions] by Destiny_Knight
My guy, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't it outperform humans, in everything but social sciences?...
sumane12 t1_jef16qv wrote
Reply to Resistance is Mounting Against OpenAI and GPT-5 by BackgroundResult
First They Ignore You, Then They Laugh at You, Then They Attack You, Then You Win