t3rmina1
t3rmina1 t1_j42ht55 wrote
Reply to comment by Neo_Techni in Self-driving stroller aims to reduce parents’ stress – at cost of £2,700 by diacewrb
>The stroller is packed with sensors, motors and AI and is capable of driving itself when empty, keeping up with parents while they hold their infants and stopping automatically if it goes out of reach or encounters an obstacle.
>Electric motors also aid when manually pushing the 13.6kg stroller, similar to an e-bike, assisting with inclines and automatically braking when going downhill
It doesn't navigate by itself when you've got a baby in it. But of course, you're incapable of reading more than a title
t3rmina1 t1_ir7wjac wrote
Reply to Humans operating on humans are still better than robots operating on humans...even when a human is operating the robot. by Notreallyonreddityet
This is bullshit. The article is based largely on anecdotal evidence from certain surgeons, while the author completely ignores the findings of the one study she cites to claim greater complications, when the study actually claims lesser reintervention for robotic surgery.
t3rmina1 t1_j42luyb wrote
Reply to comment by Neo_Techni in Self-driving stroller aims to reduce parents’ stress – at cost of £2,700 by diacewrb
Says the person who said the buyer should receive a Darwin award.
And let's say it could drive with the baby in it, why not say: anyone who buys a self-driving car should also receive a Darwin award
But, rather than checking if it was possible, you jumped straight to conclusions like it was an Olympic sport.