tabrisangel
tabrisangel t1_jc8ryyw wrote
Reply to comment by breaditbans in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
It's ONLY gotten sooner, not later.
tabrisangel t1_jc3mkw4 wrote
Reply to comment by InternationalBand494 in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
Unless you're like 70 years old on reddit, you'll likely live past the depletion date.
tabrisangel t1_jc3jcmc wrote
Reply to comment by psychorameses in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
Yes it has a depletion date in 2034.
Anyone here claiming social security is fine have truely zero idea what they are talking about. The numbers of today are very much not the numbers of 2035. It's one of those things where the graph doesn't look so bad until you forecast 10 years out.
It would take HUGE large changes today to add a few years to the depletion date.
tabrisangel t1_jbgut45 wrote
Reply to comment by schooledbrit in [OC] The world's biggest banks in 1988 by Solid-Tea7377
Japan is literally one of the very worst economies on earth.
Crippling debt and 2 times as many people dieing each year then are being born.
I think it's the only economy in the world that's smaller than it was 1994.
tabrisangel t1_ja2xulm wrote
Reply to comment by MightyH20 in The cities built to be reusable by WestEst101
Deaths from disasters are way way way down from a historical perspective. It's an engineering problem that we've mostly solved since 1900. Forbes
The actual changes in natural disasters seem to be theoretical and small. 2010-2020 had the least category 3 or higher hurricanes on record.
Also look at the chart here.
tabrisangel t1_j5g60cp wrote
Reply to comment by st4n13l in Racial diversity in top tech & biotech companies [OC] by teamongered
Oh damn you got him! (By making an absurd strawman argument
tabrisangel t1_j1ki9dh wrote
Reply to comment by Tigris_Morte in Caltech and Activision Publishing Team Up to Combat Bad Behavior Online by thatsawce
It was a joke clearly, stop being so sensitive and quick to defend things on the internet no-one likes a know it all.
tabrisangel t1_jc8sitg wrote
Reply to comment by breaditbans in [OC] US Social Security Fund History by PM_Ur_Illiac_Furrows
That's just a lie and minimizing the problem.
Nowhere was it ever 2025 you'll need to link something serious.
It STARTS at 75% the first year, then goes lower and lower. It's not as if it will just stay at that figure when you forecast out to 2050 for example.