telmimore

telmimore t1_ix4isbe wrote

The conference only selects the best papers. Hence, quality. The fact that you can't comprehend this simple logic and are still going on about "quality over quantity hurrr durr" is astonishing frankly.

The nature index only looks at high quality papers as well. Again, if you read the link you'd have known this and wouldn't have gone on to your irrelevant rhetoric.

What's amazing is at least 3 other simpletons chose to vote you up and give you awards for straight up incorrect bullshit.

1

telmimore t1_ix3tl44 wrote

Why don't you read the fucking comment I replied to? He claimed China doesn't have good researchers, yet they just outdid the US at the top semiconductor conference on the planet that is highly selective on which papers they accept. I at no point claimed their semiconductor industry is already leading edge (although I'm sure they will catch up way faster than anyone expects). God damn you're all so brainwashed.

0

telmimore t1_ix37yrn wrote

Yet their patents are skyrocketing, their scientific journal impact is skyrocketing, they ranked #1 for selected research papers in a recent prestigious chip conference, etc. Etc. Your anecdotes are meaningless vs actual objective measures.

https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Tech/Semiconductors/China-tops-U.S.-to-take-research-crown-at-global-chip-conference

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01231-w

−3