theannotator
theannotator t1_jaey7kd wrote
Reply to comment by -DementedAvenger- in LPT: You can put a . anywhere* in a gmail address to make a new email that still goes to your inbox by Bomblord1
https://www.thehelm.com/ Helm used to be a turnkey self hosted email service. https://proton.me/mail Proton is a privacy focused (still work with LE for criminal investigations) email service.
theannotator t1_jaet9ph wrote
Reply to comment by dulce_3t_decorum_3st in TIL exactly what it means to be “Hanged, drawn and quartered”: “…fastened to a hurdle, or wooden panel, and drawn by horse to the place of execution, where he was then hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded, and quartered (chopped into four pieces).” by CatsKittensCatsBunny
This is Reddit. The /s is always needed.
theannotator t1_jaesdea wrote
Reply to TIL exactly what it means to be “Hanged, drawn and quartered”: “…fastened to a hurdle, or wooden panel, and drawn by horse to the place of execution, where he was then hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded, and quartered (chopped into four pieces).” by CatsKittensCatsBunny
Aren’t people great! /s
theannotator t1_jadvxwf wrote
Reply to comment by stephenmg1284 in LPT: You can put a . anywhere* in a gmail address to make a new email that still goes to your inbox by Bomblord1
Proton, the now dead helm, and other email providers who aren’t google provide catch all or wildcard addresses for a low fee. It’s not easy for the non tech savvy, but if you are then it’s trivial to configure.
theannotator t1_jadp8d6 wrote
Reply to LPT: You can put a . anywhere* in a gmail address to make a new email that still goes to your inbox by Bomblord1
You can also add a + tag inline such as email address+companyname@gmail.com and it will be auto labeled.
theannotator t1_jacikn7 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Belgian Jailed In Iran “Forcibly Disappeared, Subjected To Torture” by Bozzooo
How do you propose doing this without bombs, boots, and bullets?
theannotator t1_ja3wuem wrote
Reply to comment by mattgen88 in Backroads of Ireland. Taken by me in 2018 by Special_Ambition_667
That was my experience in Shannon’s airport. Manual trans, which I can drive, but was on the opposite side so left handed shifting plus rock fences and busses left me on a white knuckle drive to Galway. I didn’t sleep on the flight over from SF. Ireland was great, but I should have gotten a hotel, slept, then gone to Moher but it was a work trip.
theannotator t1_ja30f99 wrote
Reply to comment by prozacnzoloft in Teach me how to read by prozacnzoloft
Pick a selection of the top books right now and read the inserts description. Find a library and check some out. If you don’t like the book try another genre or author in the same genre. Or. Look at the shoes you enjoy and try something there assuming it isn’t home renovation or baking.
theannotator t1_ja1wh0e wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The Supreme Court Actually Understands the Internet by rejs7
Well me hearty, when 98% of the market defaults to you that’s a monopoly. Businesses and the government largely aren’t on the others. Government shouldn’t use a private monopoly of a platform (twitter and YouTube for comma and google for finding info)that isn’t neutral for official communication.
It’s obvious we won’t come to a consensus, but it’s been nice having a discussion that didn’t include ad hominem attacks or bring up certain mustachioed men.
Good day!
theannotator t1_ja1uwml wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The Supreme Court Actually Understands the Internet by rejs7
But you can’t really go somewhere else in most cases. It’s a monopoly. Kill 230 or carve out these monopolies and you get a more free market approach.
theannotator t1_ja1tun3 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The Supreme Court Actually Understands the Internet by rejs7
Fox shows don’t get section 230 protections. Your examples do.
theannotator t1_ja1skz9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The Supreme Court Actually Understands the Internet by rejs7
Not when they claim they aren’t and are allowed to donate funds to political candidates. In an age where whatever google returns to your search on the first page is the truth it does matter if they filter topics, ideas, or statements that aren’t illegal and don’t indicate that it’s biased or an ad. It’s 15 years too late to compete with google as a search engine, 10 years to late for YouTube, and probably already too late for a small chrome competitor. gmail is the odd exception and you can replace it trivially. They are a monopoly just like bell and should be broken.
theannotator t1_ja1oo6k wrote
Reply to comment by CrucioIsMade4Muggles in The Supreme Court Actually Understands the Internet by rejs7
Not if you claim to be a platform and not a publisher.
theannotator t1_ja1nllt wrote
Reply to comment by CrucioIsMade4Muggles in The Supreme Court Actually Understands the Internet by rejs7
But in this specific case, if they knew masks would be in short supply they could have recommended cloth coverings as a placebo that wouldn’t actually be harmful. The government is demonstrably not infallible.
theannotator t1_ja1n5h2 wrote
Reply to comment by CrucioIsMade4Muggles in The Supreme Court Actually Understands the Internet by rejs7
What is good for humanity as a whole isn’t the same as what is best for any individual. Why should the government get to tell me to expose myself to a virus with an initially reported mortality rate that would have resulted in death carts in the streets. If the government told you to take six six cylinder revolvers, load one round in one of the three pistols, and randomly select one to play Russian roulette with would you do it? The early reports of dying from covid were worse percentages than that.
theannotator t1_ja1mltm wrote
Reply to comment by CrucioIsMade4Muggles in The Supreme Court Actually Understands the Internet by rejs7
Please remind me why I should trust anything I’m told by a stranger without verification on my part. Especially when the statement is obviously wrong.
theannotator t1_j9yox9x wrote
The current format with companies claiming 230 protections and then taking actions they shouldn’t get protected for can’t continue. Something needs to change but it’s probably not happening from the legislative branch at a federal level. The amount of things that got people throttled or banned but ended up being true in the past three years is unacceptable. You can disagree with an opinion but the platform shouldn’t be banning things that aren’t illegal and still get 230.
theannotator t1_j9y5mn2 wrote
Reply to Climate change, urbanization drive major declines in L.A.’s birds. 40% of bird species were present at fewer sites today than they were 100 years ago, while only 10% were present at more sites. Meanwhile, in the Central Valley, the proportion of species that experienced a decline (23%) by Wagamaga
Animal populations fall in major cities as they are built. I’m kinda shocked it wasn’t a bigger drop. I leave my pastures I alone most of the year and just mow paths. Most of the year I only see a few of birds other than eagles, hawks, and the like, but in the winter smaller birds flock to the feeders and I get hundreds. Most people can’t not use the land they own. I’m not sure what the answer is for cities. Pesticide use probably isn’t helping. In the agricultural areas I think that is much more important in the US. https://ocm.auburn.edu/newsroom/news_articles/2020/10/141359-miao-bird-study.php#:~:text=When%20birds%20eat%20the%20pesticide,decrease%20birds'%20abilities%20to%20reproduce.
theannotator t1_jaezmxs wrote
Reply to comment by -DementedAvenger- in LPT: You can put a . anywhere* in a gmail address to make a new email that still goes to your inbox by Bomblord1
I had the V1 from very early days. It wasn’t flawless but it was easy enough to use for my spouse, and worked with most email clients which proton does not.