throwaway957280
throwaway957280 t1_jdl2cq3 wrote
Reply to comment by RealSonZoo in [R] Reflexion: an autonomous agent with dynamic memory and self-reflection - Noah Shinn et al 2023 Northeastern University Boston - Outperforms GPT-4 on HumanEval accuracy (0.67 --> 0.88)! by Singularian2501
If you pay for ChatGPT plus and manually select the new model, yes. By default, no.
throwaway957280 t1_jcsjj07 wrote
Reply to comment by ThatInternetGuy in [P] The next generation of Stanford Alpaca by [deleted]
Is OpenAI actually legally allowed to do that? How is using their model for training different from training on copyrighted data which all these models do?
throwaway957280 OP t1_j89eiz0 wrote
Reply to comment by OptimizedGarbage in [D] Have their been any attempts to create a programming language specifically for machine learning? by throwaway957280
Thank you for the detailed answer! This is really interesting.
throwaway957280 t1_j7n2hfh wrote
Reply to comment by ---AI--- in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
The transformer.
throwaway957280 t1_j2c9i2b wrote
Extremely cautiously looking forward to the Avatar: The Last Airbender live action remake.
throwaway957280 t1_ixsdfs8 wrote
Reply to comment by LiveFromNewYork95 in NBC’s Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade Scores Its Most Viewers in 5 Years With Streams on Peacock (27.7M Viewers) by MarvelsGrantMan136
Yeah on-demand streaming has overcorrected from the issues of cable a little bit. There's now a lot more live content on streaming services and I would like to see that continue, and not just for sports.
throwaway957280 t1_iugy1id wrote
Reply to comment by Boring-Pudding in ‘Halloweentown’ star Kimberly J. Brown shares movie’s alternative ending by MarielaGorman
These movies have genuinely awesome world-building. The creativity was off the charts.
throwaway957280 t1_iro2ijw wrote
Is it a common belief that all life is just different manifestations of the same consciousness? Not in a vague spiritual way, like a real, physically consistent way. I really can't think of a better explanation. Take consciousness as a fundamental, singular property of the universe (or reality in general) that can manifest in different ways (with some complicated interaction with brain structure/information that results in different qualia).
We obviously can only remember our own lives because physically it's only possible for our brains to generate the qualia for remembering our own past. But different people (and life, and whatever else is conscious), would still be part of the same consciousness, just physically disconnected. In the same way you might not remember being a kid a long time ago, you don't "remember" being other people (because it's physically impossible for you to have those qualia), but it's still all "you," because consciousness is just one thing, not something that gets "duplicated" for each person.
You could "model" it as reincarnation, where you experience another life after death but don't remember you're old one, but really there wouldn't be time dependence (you're this life, then you're this life), they would just be two, causally disconnected lives that don't happen in any definable order (you're this life, and you're this life, no explainable order because there's no causal connection).
throwaway957280 t1_je7du40 wrote
Reply to [R] The Debate Over Understanding in AI’s Large Language Models by currentscurrents
Worth noting this paper predates ChatGPT (3.5) by a few months.