The marker size and marker color are duplicating the same information. I would get rid of the color scale since it's harder to read than the size.

what DOES NOT constitute OC: Taking TWO screenshots or copies of someone else's mobile app or website, for use in a side-by-side comparison.

You can see the same interactive map straight from the source: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/DEMO_FIND__custom_5503295/bookmark/map?lang=en&bookmarkId=ccc500e8-49c5-4b8c-ba90-564f7bcb8df2

What's with the copyright statement in the bottom right?

It's as if Mexico and the US have a shared border and a free trade agreement.

Adrienne LaFrance wrote about trying to send a telegram in 2016 for The Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/01/rip-stop-telegrams/425136/

"If you are citing a source, you must be specific."

https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/27k8ncej1m/results_Retro%20Activities.pdf

I wonder if they were thinking of the messaging app.

TIL about Tok Pisin, a creole language spoken in Papua Niugini.

Your infographic says "UBS and Credit Suisse together hold combined assets of over 7x Swiss GDP", but the Reuters article you link to says "The banks, two of the most systemically relevant in global finance, hold combined assets of up to 140% of Swiss gross domestic product..."

I think this is because you're using assets under management and total assets interchangeably, which doesn't seem correct. UBS's 2022 annual report lists its total assets as $1.1 trillion, which is different from the $4.5 trillion of assets that it manages.

The paper cited by OP (whose comment appears to be shadow banned) cites two surveys:

1. "450,000 responses to the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index" reported by Kahneman and Deaton (2010).
2. Data from trackyourhappiness.org as reported by Killingsworth (2021).

It should be the difference between per capita and per taxpayer since not all city residents are city taxpayers.

You can play around with Arctic (and Antarctic) sea ice data from the National Snow & Ice Data Center here: https://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/charctic-interactive-sea-ice-graph/

This isn't a nuance. This is the entire point of a data visualization. From this sub's rule on qualifying data visualizations: "A data variable must be transformed and mapped onto a visual property such as color, size, or position." If the bars don't scale with anything, they're useless, and what we're left with is a weirdly formatted table with random shapes attached to them.

It doesn't make sense at all. If we compare miscellaneous in the expenses column ($1.8 billion/5%) and processed revenue in the revenue column ($1.6 billion/2.8%), the miscellaneous bar is smaller even though it is larger in absolute dollars and as a percentage.

The article also has a line graph of Russian imports that shows they have recovered to more or less pre-invasion levels. That would seem to be pretty convincing evidence that Russian is not isolated from trade, regardless of how country circle sizes are scaled in the other figures.

"...viewers need to be able to understand what is being visualized based on information provided in the visualization and its title."

This is in the sub's rules. Let's see if it gets enforced.

"I donated to both parties. I donated about the same amount to both parties."

Something that's dawning upon me is that I think a lot of people believe a busy graph means the results are more profound.

Good point, it is per 100k population. But even if women can't drive in Saudi, they can still ride in cars and die in road accidents, although WHO statistics show 87% of reported road traffic fatalities were men. I also can't figure out if a pedestrian killed by a car counts as a road traffic fatality.

>considering they don't let over half the population drive. I wonder if the low death rates in some countries are driven by lower car ownership in general.

The point of reporting deaths per 100k is to account for differences in the number of drivers. And Saudi Arabia's road death rate per 100k is probably so high exactly because only men can drive.

Edit: It's per total population not per driver. My mistake. I still maintain Saudi road death rates are high because only men can drive.

lakh = 100,000

You wouldn't say it on the basis of these data, but unemployment is down: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE

Are those really error bars coming out of the bars, or is it yet another unnecessary visual element like the images in the bars and the picture of a truck at a weird angle?

If the numbers are from Item 1A in the filing, the passenger operating revenue should be $12,396 M instead of $12,296 M.