That’s exactly what I told my wife, who orders these any chance she gets. I let her go to town and then I scoop up the leftovers with a crostini.

This is a manufacturing stutter. Good ole Stuttering Stanley

Your dad may be far right, but the guy in the middle is far out!

Burnt, Burnt, Al dente

Thank you! Everyone thinks it’s a them vs us thing like the in the movies. More likely it’s an integration. Think of it as the Borg but with Super Bowl parties.

What answer? What even is the question? Your entire post was a poorly thought-out and worded declaration. You made a conclusion and tried to support it with other wonky conclusions, but with no meat.

OP is trying to make a point, but doesn’t know how to properly convey that point. First his title references “search index” but then switches to “search engines” and further tries to dumb the process down to “hyperlink crawling”. These are specific terms with different uses. That’s why everyone is jumping down his throat instantly.

OP is also taking A.I. composition at its current face value and not looking even a few years ahead. Even at its current state, A.I. can be hyper focused to generate vastly different results. OP just doesn’t understand how to use it properly.

Example, if you wanted to bake cookies in 1980, you would generally open a cookbook (maybe you had 2 or 3 and maybe a box of index cards). You would be presented with the same recipe and create the same cookies, because you limited your recipes to only your kitchen. With the internet, now you have access to millions of cookie recipes. OP is stuck thinking that A.I. is only using 1 recipe. Just as with most internet searching, you need to ask properly or else be given canned results.

“Give me chocolate chip cookie recipe from Betty Crocker 1985, substitute sugar for Truvia”. Bam…A.I. just showed you the tip of the iceberg. Google will show you separate results for the individual keywords and make you go down the rabbit hole. A.I. is basically asking someone else to Google search a bunch of stuff for you and compile a proper response…in seconds.

I swear this was a scene from Freddy’s Dead: The Final Nightmare

By county is a weird way to present this. Dot for the city makes more sense.

When it’s not spelled as A.I., it’s fun to read it as AL

Imagine a sequel or remake to that 5 movie, and it’s superior to the original. What do you rate the better film?

A 5 should never be given since you can’t rate higher should you find something better. A 1 should rarely be given since people took the time and money to put something together. You should be able to find some value (lighting, dialog, camerawork, end purpose, etc). If you find yourself watching an actual 1…question what got you in this situation and your choices.

What if the posts are small bits of input to store an entire brain? 0001101100010

Also no, Nathan Fillion was the backbone and he would be a sad imitation of himself at this point.

No way. Firefly was all about the characters and the actors’ ability to nail them. A reboot would fall way short.

Has anyone actually read the article? It seems like it was translated using Google. It’s also full of misinformation and odd explanations.

Ted Mosby. Because nobody likes Ted Mosby. He even watched the film adaptation of himself as Jed Mosley, which was a box office smash…yet Ted Mosby hated it.

Seems like a lot of money. We went to an Asian Fusion last night and spent less than $100.

Good ole world debt

RI has 0 of either, but 3 BJ’s

That random Gluten Free in the middle right