No space for mother in law.

Looking into this now. Thanks for the helpful comment.

Y'all mf need calculus 1

Growth rate should peak and decline before population peaks. Unless there is some cataclysmic event that drives it down suddenly, like a nuclear war.

Someone could argue that there is a time interval that when tracked in nano seconds displays a sudden drop in growth rate before those hypothetical millions perished, but this is more pedantic than practical and wouldn't give much insight into how society was changing at that time.

There is a discrete aspect both in time and in number of humans (not to mention non-linearities to rates due to catastrophes) so it might not be exactly 0 over some time interval, but yes, there should be some identifiable relative maxima in population near rate ~0.

So the growth rate (first derivative of population change?) is expected to be its maximum value at population= 8.6 billion?

Chief twit has a long history of being a terrible coder. His foundation is terrible code, before the Paypal dumb luck.

They don't "serve" booze, but I bet you kind find some

The Demon crats must have manipulated the entire world demand for oil in order to squeak out an almost-victory in the Senate and loss in the House.

Or was it the Republicunts who controlled the entire world demand for oil?

Edit: /s you dense fucks

It's true and ironic given the Sikh emblem is a throwing blade, on top of a sword, encompassed by two swords.

I know it's all symbolism, but it's objectively funny. At some point some fairly peaceful folks got together and wondered, "What's the best way to symbolize the sovereignty and strength of our people?" And some dude was like, "A sword!"

Everyone agreed this was good, but how do we represent the duality and intertwined aspects of our spirituality, faith, and resolve?

And some dude was like, "A sword facing the opposite direction!"

And roads. They divide our society by roads.