ukamal6
ukamal6 t1_j57xr99 wrote
Reply to comment by Mephisto6 in [D] ICLR 2023 results. by East-Beginning9987
That's really wonderful, congrats!! :)
ukamal6 t1_j57v9um wrote
Reply to comment by velcher in [D] ICLR 2023 results. by East-Beginning9987
Congrats to you as well!! Hope to see you there! :)
ukamal6 t1_j57v7mu wrote
Reply to comment by Mephisto6 in [D] ICLR 2023 results. by East-Beginning9987
Ahh yes, you're right!
ukamal6 t1_j57miqb wrote
Reply to [D] ICLR 2023 results. by East-Beginning9987
First first-authored paper here, got accepted with a spotlight!
ukamal6 t1_iv6vwli wrote
Reply to comment by MD_rail in [D] ICLR 2023 reviews are out. How was your experience ? by dasayan05
My first submission here, and got the same score as well. Probably I will have to convince the 6 scoring reviewers and increase their ratings a bit.
ukamal6 t1_j59rey7 wrote
Reply to comment by AdMassive9465 in [D] ICLR 2023 results. by East-Beginning9987
About the trainwreck review part, I totally agree with you. Even after the deadline, I was getting random (I am saying random because I had almost close to zero expertise in those fields, so I had to decline all those requests) emergency review invitations which made me understand the overall situation. One thing that made me really confused was: why did they take so much time (almost 2 months, after the author discussion period was over) to send out the decision? I was really not sure why the meta-review process deserved this much time (~60 days) when the actual review time was just 12 days! Any thoughts about this?