undercover_lesbeean
undercover_lesbeean t1_jdb9uuv wrote
Reply to comment by Pipe-International in Thoughts on Booktok by [deleted]
NYTBS are still multiple genres though, there is plenty of diversity. Some are actual quality books and some not.
Idk about the oprah club thing, because I've not seen it.
undercover_lesbeean t1_jdb3hf6 wrote
Reply to comment by Pipe-International in Thoughts on Booktok by [deleted]
ofc not, but it's becoming more widespread. bookstores now have "booktok rec" tables, and when i tell you that it's just rows and rows of the SAME FUCKING BOOK, they all just look the same, it makes me want to cry
undercover_lesbeean t1_jdb0r7q wrote
Reply to comment by Handyandy58 in Thoughts on Booktok by [deleted]
commodification of books-churning out books that are basically carbon copy repeats, rinse repeat
undercover_lesbeean t1_jdatx7x wrote
Reply to Thoughts on Booktok by [deleted]
genuinely can not imagine ONE positive thing about booktok. It's ruining reading
undercover_lesbeean t1_jddeyu6 wrote
Reply to comment by Handyandy58 in Thoughts on Booktok by [deleted]
right, so sorry for caring, i'll go on my merry way