volci

volci t1_jbbrlww wrote

> Done right this is hard to decode or even detect unless you know the algorithm.

And then you gett he problem of security by obscurity .. "as long as no one knows how we did it, it's secure!"

2

volci t1_jb9il5y wrote

>Besides being perfectly secure, the new algorithm showed up to 40 per cent higher encoding efficiency than previous steganography methods, they said.

Sorry, but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence

If you're altering a source file (by adding information, as in this example), it's detectable

Cryptographic hashes are a perfect test for this type of communication - the hash of the original will never match that of the altered copy

The only "perfectly secure" communication is a true one-time pad ...though, of course, the individuals using that system are subject to data extraction through less 'technical' means

394