zagglefrapgooglegarb
zagglefrapgooglegarb t1_j6hfyky wrote
Reply to ELI5 - When losing weight, why is it common to hear "burn more than you consume" in reference to calorie intake. if you consume" 1000 calories, how do you burn 1500? by Freedom-No-781
You burn about 2000 calories a day (depending on your gender, size, etc) doing absolutely nothing. Your body's metabolism burns calories. If you naturally burn 2000 a day, and then through exercise burn another 300 and only eat 2000 calories, you will be in a calorie deficit.
In short, track what you eat and don't overeat. It's not complicated, despite what all the fad diets and weight loss companies would lead you to believe.
zagglefrapgooglegarb t1_iybkyry wrote
There is a competitive sdvantage to be gained by feigning injury or exaggerating a tackle. It's the same logic as claiming a corner or throw in when you know you shouldn't be awarded one. This exact same potential competitive advantage doesn't exist in other sports, but where one does people will attempt to manipulate it for their/their team's benefit. Like a player claiming they made a catch in the NFL when they know they weren't in bounds or when the ball grazed the turf first. Or when a QB makes sure the refs notice any late contact in the hopes of a roughing the passer call.
zagglefrapgooglegarb t1_itileqb wrote
Reply to What's one movie you hate that everyone else loves? What is one film you love that everyone else hates? by [deleted]
Silver Linings Playbook is not good.
Knowing is pretty good.
zagglefrapgooglegarb t1_jcu6bmh wrote
Reply to comment by 9600n81 in ELI5: How do we end up with politically biased newspapers? by cur-o-double
This, in a nutshell, is it.
'But why do journalists promote those opinions or points of view if they're just being told to?'
Because they wouldn't be there if they didn't already lean that way themselves. Journalists don't become corrupted or biased, they're only there because they already are.