zaptrem
zaptrem t1_jarbbig wrote
Reply to comment by brooklynlad in My OMNYCard design by NYCBikeLanes
I love the design by why bother with a card when you can just pay with your phone?
zaptrem t1_j62isft wrote
Reply to comment by Evening_Presence_927 in Mayor Adams unveils proposal to convert Midtown offices into apartments by psychothumbs
If you actually flood the market that demand will quickly be met.
zaptrem t1_j5yg0ej wrote
Reply to comment by debrises in [P] Diffusion models best practices by debrises
Yes
zaptrem t1_j5xacgt wrote
Reply to [P] Diffusion models best practices by debrises
Try to get your data as close as possible to a normal distribution with a low variance. What type of data?
zaptrem t1_j4c9p2l wrote
Reply to comment by elcric_krej in [D] Mtruk alternatives for extracting information out of text by elcric_krej
Validate samples = you feed completed outputs to humans and ask them to click correct/incorrect.
Validation samples = you all humans to manually complete the task themselves. Slow and expensive.
zaptrem t1_j4a83db wrote
Reply to comment by elcric_krej in [D] Mtruk alternatives for extracting information out of text by elcric_krej
Not your fault, but it seems reasonable to interpret "validation samples" as samples for your validation set (e.g., you wanted people to manually label something for your training/validation data).
zaptrem t1_j4a6k1f wrote
Reply to comment by HaMMeReD in [D] Is MusicGPT a viable possibility? by markhachman
>No portion of the Software, nor any content created with the Software, may be used for commercial purposes.
zaptrem t1_j4a4bhl wrote
Reply to comment by HaMMeReD in [D] Is MusicGPT a viable possibility? by markhachman
Jukebox license is different from the one you're thinking of.
zaptrem t1_j49jqfr wrote
Reply to comment by elcric_krej in [D] Mtruk alternatives for extracting information out of text by elcric_krej
Idk why I’m being downvoted… you said you “wanted validation samples” not that you wanted to validate samples.
zaptrem t1_j47af3e wrote
If it’s just text have you tried using an LLM like GPT3 with human verification?
zaptrem t1_j2e2lvb wrote
Reply to comment by Disastrous_Elk_6375 in An Open-Source Version of ChatGPT is Coming [News] by lambolifeofficial
You can do pipeline parallelism via FairScale and HF Accelerate on any identical (and sometimes non identical) GPUs.
zaptrem t1_izn4krn wrote
Reply to comment by FerretDude in [R] Illustrating Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) by robotphilanthropist
Are there any plans to reproduce WebGPT as part of the InstructGPT reproduction seeing as ChatGPT appears to already have or will be receiving such functionality soon?
zaptrem t1_ixbniz5 wrote
Reply to [R] SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Models - Massachusetts Institute of Technology and NVIDIA Guangxuan Xiao et al - Enables INT8 for LLM bigger than 100B parameters including OPT-175B, BLOOM-176B and GLM-130B. by Singularian2501
Could these advancements in quantization be used to train in int8 as well?
zaptrem t1_ir8ws0l wrote
Reply to comment by IntelArtiGen in [R] Google announces Imagen Video, a model that generates videos from text by Erosis
Don’t worry, all we have to do to make the problem go away is end racism and all other biases in real life!
zaptrem t1_jb8i4cr wrote
Reply to comment by Jurph in [R] We found nearly half a billion duplicated images on LAION-2B-en. by von-hust
> the author of AUTOMATIC1111
…you mean AUTOMATIC1111? That’s their name.